![]() ![]() Klinthäll M (2006) Retirement return migration from Sweden. Bull Shimane Prefect Mt Reg Res Center 5:73–76 Kasamatsu H (2009) Shokibo koureika shuuraku nosaiseini mukete. Kalantaridis C (2010) In-migration, entrepreneurship and ruralurban interdependencies: the case of East Cleveland, North East England. Hugo G, Moren-Alegret R (2008) International migration to non-metropolitan areas of higher income countries. ![]() doi: 10.2765/80301įujii T, Tarumi A, Fujiwara M (2009) Possibility of village sustainment and resource management. Health CareĮuropean Commission (2009) Ageing report: economic and budgetary projections for the EU-27 Member States (2008–2060). The impact of ageing on public expenditure: projectories for the EU25 member States on pensions, health care, long-term care, education and unemployment transfers (2004–2050). The ageing countryside: the growing older population of rural England, pp 29–50Įconomic Policy Committee and European Commission (2006) EUROPEAN ECONOMY. Edward Arnold, London, p 226Ĭhampion T, Shepherd J (2006) Demographic change in rural England. doi: 10.1108/13552550810897641Ĭhampion T (1989) Counterurbanization: the changing pace and nature of population deconcentration. Int J Entrepreneurial Behav Res 14(5):268–275. doi: 10.1002/pspīull M (2008) Challenging tensions: critical, theoretical and empirical perspectives on social enterprise. Sega Publications, London, p 329īijker RA, Haartsen T (2011) More than Counter-urbanisation!: migration. Eathscan, UK, p 228īerry B (1977) Urbanisation and counterurbanization. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2006.08.009īell S, Morse S (2008) Sustainability indicators measuring the immeasurable. doi: 10.1002/pspĪmcoff J, Westholm E (2007) Understanding rural change-demography as a key to the future. On the other hand, the current state of the central community is considered as that of the “sustaining” community for which a revitalization approach is recommended in order to rejuvenate the diminishing community functions.Īmcoff J (2006) Rural population growth in Sweden in the 1990s: unexpected reality or spatial–statistical chimera? Popul Space Place 12(3):171–185. These findings suggest the current state of the remote community can be seen as that of the “marginalizing” community, for which a welfare-based approach is recommended to secure the living conditions of the residents. The results demonstrated significant differences between the two groups of communities mainly on four aspects: (1) farming type, (2) visits and roles of out-migrated family, (3) self-evaluation of living conditions, and (4) residents’ future concerns. In order to capture the multidimensionality of residents’ daily lives, sustainable development indicators, which are originally designed to capture the well-being of nations, were utilized to develop the questionnaire. This survey was composed of two sections: (1) a questionnaire-based survey to households and (2) an interview survey with the chairperson of each community. These communities were selected based on their locations, population decline and aging rates, and population sizes and were categorized into two groups, the remote and the central communities. A field survey was conducted in five rural communities in Yurihonjo-shi in Akita Prefecture, Japan. This study examines the marginalization process of rural communities, which is caused by the decline of community-based autonomy and various activities in relation to the decline and aging of their populations, based on the frameworks that describe the process in three stages.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |